Does FancyCache not do read-ahead?
If it did, it would speed up some programs a lot, because some operations, such as FSCTL_GET_NTFS_FILE_RECORD (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library ... 64568.aspx), do not perform a read-ahead, and so using them is a lot slower than it should be. FancyCache could greatly improve the performance of programs that do such operations.
No read-ahead?
Re: No read-ahead?
Thanks for your suggestions.
Currently FC doesn't implement read-ahead.
Currently FC doesn't implement read-ahead.