SUPERCACHE VS FANCYCACHE

FAQ, getting help, user experience about FancyCache

SUPERCACHE VS FANCYCACHE

Postby motoleon » Wed Jan 04, 2012 10:46 pm

Windows 7 SP1 64 BIT, VBOX machine 1500mb RAM, 2 cores, run from USB disk on host machine (i7 8G notebook).

Normal disk access:

ORIGINAL.jpg
ORIGINAL.jpg (81.09 KiB) Viewed 3254 times


SuperSpeed SuperCache 5, 512M, 8K, R/W, DIF 10SEC

SUPERCACHE.jpg
SUPERCACHE.jpg (83.39 KiB) Viewed 3254 times


FancyCache 0.7, 512M, 8K, R/W, DIF 10SEC

FANCYCACHE.jpg
FANCYCACHE.jpg (82.7 KiB) Viewed 3254 times


No coments. :o
motoleon
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:00 pm

Re: SUPERCACHE VS FANCYCACHE

Postby support » Fri Jan 06, 2012 6:02 am

Thank you for the feedback!
User avatar
support
 
Posts: 981
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 2:42 am

Re: SUPERCACHE VS FANCYCACHE

Postby minhgi » Fri Jan 06, 2012 3:52 pm

I have both use Supercache and Fancycache.

Fancycache is the better option.
minhgi
 
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 3:52 pm

Re: SUPERCACHE VS FANCYCACHE

Postby sparkler » Fri Jan 06, 2012 7:22 pm

ive trialed supercache it corrupted both disks ive used it on only one had deferred write on
sparkler
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:06 am

Re: SUPERCACHE VS FANCYCACHE

Postby CosminNet » Wed Jan 18, 2012 5:26 pm

sparkler wrote:ive trialed supercache it corrupted both disks ive used it on only one had deferred write on

also trialed supercache and got corrupted files on two machines several times. on one i had to reinstall windows and both had lazy writes on. seems that the app did not flush files on shutdown and soemtimes it mixed pieces between files. since they have so many certifications i thought it sould be great but it was worse than dissapointing. also the price of 80$ (for desktop as for server it's a lot more) seems excessive. after i had the troubes i had i would not use that even if they paid me. they also don't have any forums or someone correct me if i'm worng.

fancycache (this is a catchy name :) ) actually seems as fast as or a bit faster than superspeed (subjectively speaking) but so far did not have any troubles. also hope that pricing will be sensible when it retails.
CosminNet
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 5:35 pm

Re: SUPERCACHE VS FANCYCACHE

Postby inspron » Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:13 pm

I hope beta testers that I has been providing valuable feedback on this forum get a complimentary copy a steep discount.
inspron
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 6:59 pm

Re: SUPERCACHE VS FANCYCACHE

Postby minhgi » Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:00 am

I said if you bought a copy of Primo Ramdisk, we should get a discount for Fancycache. Like a bundle. I have not seem company that put so much pride in their product and customer support. Romeo can have my money when Fancycache come out.

I pay for SuperCache and Ramdisk PLus. The two product cause me noting but grief.
minhgi
 
Posts: 43
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 3:52 pm

Re: SUPERCACHE VS FANCYCACHE

Postby gabrielmorrow » Sun Jan 22, 2012 1:53 pm

minhgi wrote:I said if you bought a copy of Primo Ramdisk, we should get a discount for Fancycache. Like a bundle. I have not seem company that put so much pride in their product and customer support. Romeo can have my money when Fancycache come out.

I pay for SuperCache and Ramdisk PLus. The two product cause me noting but grief.

if your gonna buy it you can email sales and there sale you it but they dont recommend you buy it since its beta

personaly ive done bought a copy i dont mind paying for good software even if it was donationware id still pay
gabrielmorrow
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 9:29 pm


Return to Technical Support

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests