Romex Software Forum

After upgraded to 0.98 Server, the GUI say that the key is expired and I can't use the file key because "This key file is not intended for the current program edition!".

After upgraded to 0.98 Server, the GUI say that the key is expired and I can't use the file key because "This key file is not intended for the current program edition!".

It's the first official version of PrimoCache, but things (like exe) always called FanyC...

Could we have the changelog?

I use PrimoCache 0.9.0 on 3 computer with RST (RAID10). No problem at all on them.

So all write between L1, L2 and HDD are sync... Anyway to implement defer on L2? Because if you do it, we can have secure READ&WRITE in L1 synced with L2 and defer on HDD, so if we get a power lost L2 have the last data. And with that we can have better write performance, because we use L2 full ...

@support do you think that you can split the strategy between L1 and L2?
To be able have Read (or Read/Write but no deferred between L1 and L2) on L1 and Read/Write on L2 with deferred.

Installed and I test with this setup: Windows 8 x64 GPT BIOS/EFI (Gigabyte P67) 4x2TB in RAID10 => 4TB in OS => 1 unique volume C: PrimoCache: 32K LFU-R Read/Wirte No defer-write PrimoCache L1: 1024GB RAM (+ ~450Mo overhead) [Total RAM 16GB) PrimoCache L2: 14336MB on USB 3.0 Key [MX-FX Mach Extreme ...

I have not tested yet, but I have the same setup as minhgi (Windows 8 x64, GPT, UEFI, RAID10 => 4x2TB => 4TB in OS). UEFI, is it officially supported (integrated feature) by PrimoCache? (I will receive a 128GB SSD in 2 days and I planned to test VeloSSD [UEFI support integrated], but if PrimoCache s...

Regarding the persistent cache, the major problem is how to know ..... Just some comments. Thank you, Mradr and mabellon. Great discussion! Did you think my idea will be possible: Maybe you can only save which blocks (address) are used and not the block himself. And at start reload blocks directly ...