Search found 3630 matches
- Fri Dec 15, 2023 3:29 pm
- Forum: Report Bugs
- Topic: Cache "successfuly" fails to be applied when more than 65 GiByte is configured
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3489
Re: Cache "successfuly" fails to be applied when more than 65 GiByte is configured
PrimoCache will log an event when it is unable to obtain the required amount of RAM. Could you follow the guidance in the link below to check if there are any events with source "FancyCcV"? If there are, please export these events and send them to support@romexsoftware.com. Also please fol...
- Fri Dec 15, 2023 2:27 pm
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Primocache with Drivepool and SSD Optimizer
- Replies: 3
- Views: 18721
Re: Primocache with Drivepool and SSD Optimizer
Is there any benefit to using a L2 external NVME for both read and writing? I don't see how writing would benefit speed as the files already go from one of my SSDs to a HDD and the HDDs don't really swap files between themselves. The HDD drive speed being the rate limited step. Do you mean using an...
- Wed Dec 13, 2023 9:44 am
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Transfer data intermittent (by equal blocks of data)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3431
Re: Transfer data intermittent (by equal blocks of data)
Do you use the "Average" write-mode? Can you upload a screenshot of the PrimoCache main dialog as described in the link below?
https://kb.romexsoftware.com/en-us/2-pr ... leshooting
https://kb.romexsoftware.com/en-us/2-pr ... leshooting
- Wed Dec 13, 2023 9:23 am
- Forum: Report Bugs
- Topic: Cache "successfuly" fails to be applied when more than 65 GiByte is configured
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3489
Re: Cache "successfuly" fails to be applied when more than 65 GiByte is configured
It seems that PrimoCache failed to allocate memory as L1 cache. Because L2 cache can start, PrimoCache will still create the cache task. That's why you see L1 is 0 but cache task is created successfully. Is your system a NUMA architecture? If yes, you need PrimoCache Pro and enable NUMA-aware. See h...
- Wed Dec 13, 2023 9:06 am
- Forum: Report Bugs
- Topic: Issue with Thunderbird client & Deffer write
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2931
Re: Issue with Thunderbird client & Deffer write
Thank you for your feedback! We will check this issue.
- Tue Dec 05, 2023 5:59 am
- Forum: Submit Suggestions
- Topic: Defer Write - Daily and global stats
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3484
- Tue Dec 05, 2023 5:57 am
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Quick question regarding windows write cache vs primocache L1 defer write
- Replies: 3
- Views: 17066
Re: Quick question regarding windows write cache vs primocache L1 defer write
It is recommended to use the default Windows policy in "Enable write caching on the device".BetoMattos wrote: ↑Mon Dec 04, 2023 2:47 pm It would be interesting to disable the "Enable write caching on the device" function, so for those who use Primocache?
- Mon Dec 04, 2023 5:28 am
- Forum: Submit Suggestions
- Topic: Possibility of L0 cache with faster lookup by trading off some cache-hits, infront of L1.
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2428
Re: Possibility of L0 cache with faster lookup by trading off some cache-hits, infront of L1.
Thank you for your suggestion. Windows does not allow "direct-mapped" cache. The only thing we can do is working with Windows' built-in file cache, which should make caching more efficient.
- Wed Nov 29, 2023 4:09 pm
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: L2 cache only for HDD
- Replies: 2
- Views: 16624
- Thu Nov 23, 2023 7:41 am
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: NVMe characteristics important to PrimoCache?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2432
Re: NVMe characteristics important to PrimoCache?
My first question is, what sort of performance is important to PrimoCache? Is random IO performance the most important, or does PrimoCache read/write from L1 and spinning disk to/from L2 cache in sequential reads and writes? The sequential and random read/write performance of SSD are both important...