Romex Software Forum

Only real issue is that you have to keep track of the data A LOT more if the data container keeps changing around....You will also waste the space if the amount in % becomes low. That's one of the reason I say we should just pool the ram for the CL 1 cache and then asign the cache that way. (post be...

To avoid writing deleted data, you need Windows 7 (or later) and NTFS partition. Please see http://www.romexsoftware.com/en-us/fancy-cache/demo-reduce-ssd-writes.html Yes I have window 7... I was trying it on a exfat, and today I did it on a NTFS.. seems to do the same thing... if I copy and past t...

L1 should be pooled as not all devices will be running and or using as much of their set aside cache. There for, L1 should be pooled/made into its own drive with L1 on the other drives just asking for their Max sides from the pool. Aka... Drive R (Ram) is set at 512MB Drive C: will be set to a max o...

It seem to work speed wise, but from what I get from the demo selection is if I place lets say 4MB on the drive and then remove it, the Write bytes (Deferred, Normal) will be 0 or less than that? Looking at the monitor it seem to write the 4MB after my latency kicks in.

Question about the defer writes settings with the SSD and the L2 writing to this cache. I can not seem to tell how it works... but when the L2 is told to write data from the L1 cache (because it's full or w/e) does it bypass it self to write the data to the L2 cache? Right now I think the best setti...

+1 Right now, the current way you have it settup will kill SSD really fast after x amount of reboots.... Also, it slows shutdown speeds as it has to write it back to disk (or that is what I am going off). The best idea is to have it already be writing back as it keeps a copy of it on the SSD. This m...

I have to agree with fsommer1968, anything under the encrypted filesystem will be seen as one big file. Encrypted filesystem usally takes the whole file(s) and then applies the encryption code across so others can not simply break into it just by knowing one of the file(s) inside. However, we can do...