Did you run comparable environments (StarWind in a loopback with loopback accelerator enabled) or was PC running locally and StarWind over obviously slower network? Also
what benchmarks did you use to measure cache hit ratio?
stenrulz wrote:PrimoCache performs better for RAM cache speed and caching ratio.
StarWind comes with own RAM and flash cache which is distributed and synchronized between multiple nodes (safe because on node say rebooted there are many replicas of the same cache blocks so no data loss, fast becase MPIO kicks in and gathers data from different nodes + cache is deduplicated if LSF...