Search found 72 matches

Return to advanced search

Re: <1% read hit rate with Diablo 3  Topic is solved

You meant FC cannot help much in my case and it is working by design? When you run Diablo 3 for the first time since the computer boot up, the D3 data will read from the disk and come to FC cache, as well as Windows cache. Next time D3 requests some data, if they are already in Windows cache, then ...
by Mradr
Tue Jul 31, 2012 11:45 pm
 
Forum: Technical Support
Topic: <1% read hit rate with Diablo 3
Replies: 22
Views: 2628

Re: What the people are asking for + a few others.

New update to V#: [0.8.0].[5] Adeed 2 new request: 10) Release cache once cache has been loaded into normal ram. (Ram use only) 11) Profile base loading for settings. Changed: 5) Keep-Alive Performance Monitor with auto start and save options (n6666661, JimF, mabellon). - for the save option Note: I...
by Mradr
Sat Jul 21, 2012 11:05 am
 
Forum: Bug Report and Suggestion
Topic: What the people are asking for + a few others.
Replies: 41
Views: 5212

Re: Best settings - please recommend.

Yea, like I said, at one point you will hit the limit of being fast enough. We're not computers :) (I hope not yet anyways o.o;?) lol, so a few ms won't be noticed by us. Nice computer there ^^ Yea it is perty much overkill for anything we have today. Hardware finally outpase software leaving a lot ...
by Mradr
Fri Jun 22, 2012 6:18 am
 
Forum: Technical Support
Topic: Best settings - please recommend.
Replies: 9
Views: 1869

Re: Instead of caching software, why not make a hybrid setup

Enabling write caching is a no brainer... I always enable it. I've seen plenty of systems corrupted from power outages even w/o write caching. If you system or data is that precious, then you ought to have a UPS. It's not always about the system loseing power, but the system having a hickup... for ...
by Mradr
Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:40 pm
 
Forum: Bug Report and Suggestion
Topic: Instead of caching software, why not make a hybrid setup?
Replies: 2
Views: 577

Re: Best settings - please recommend.

I would change the time from 20 to 10 or even 5 sec for the HDD as it seems you will be having a larg amounts of ram. It will also keep your data a bit more safer. As for the SSD, I would use the amount of time that TRIM will kick it to help out (in that case you will have to test out what times wor...
by Mradr
Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:20 pm
 
Forum: Technical Support
Topic: Best settings - please recommend.
Replies: 9
Views: 1869

Re: What the people are asking for + a few others.

In theory if an SSD/L2 is being used as the write cache, the non-volatile nature would much improve the situation. In the event of powerfailure/crash, after reboot, the system could notice writes in L2 that had not been flushed to disk yet. Dangerous since the boot process before FC is loaded could...
by Mradr
Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:22 pm
 
Forum: Bug Report and Suggestion
Topic: What the people are asking for + a few others.
Replies: 41
Views: 5212

Re: repopulate/proactive level 1 cache

I would like the option of "infinite latency", even if it is not repopulated after a reboot. My data is all distributed computing work that just overwrites old data with new data having the same set of file names, and I normally don't need to flush it at all. You have a very interesting w...
by Mradr
Sat Jun 02, 2012 10:18 pm
 
Forum: Bug Report and Suggestion
Topic: repopulate/proactive level 1 cache
Replies: 7
Views: 688

Instead of caching software, why not make a hybrid setup?

Regarding this video and a few more following that: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBFoz_xxVvc&list=UUb4Q8Xgv55ug0UyuFbSCxtw&index=4&feature=plcp They were talking about how SSD should be used as a caching or used as a tier. They make some good points all around on both sides. They bring...
by Mradr
Sat Jun 02, 2012 9:58 pm
 
Forum: Bug Report and Suggestion
Topic: Instead of caching software, why not make a hybrid setup?
Replies: 2
Views: 577

Re: worst performance with Fc vs without when data not in ca

side note: setting cluster=block (4k in this case) and 1GB level 1 cache, wastes a lot or ram. I went from 1.2GB used to 5-6GB used. I had to set block=512KB to stay about a 1GB for level 1 cache. No way I'm robing windows intelligent/proactive/dynamic cache system (prefetch, superfetch, etc) from ...
by Mradr
Thu May 31, 2012 6:51 pm
 
Forum: Technical Support
Topic: worst performance with Fc vs without when data not in cache
Replies: 6
Views: 906

Re: What the people are asking for + a few others.

In theory if an SSD/L2 is being used as the write cache, the non-volatile nature would much improve the situation. In the event of powerfailure/crash, after reboot, the system could notice writes in L2 that had not been flushed to disk yet. However given that L2 isn't persistent in FancyCache yet, ...
by Mradr
Thu May 31, 2012 6:41 pm
 
Forum: Bug Report and Suggestion
Topic: What the people are asking for + a few others.
Replies: 41
Views: 5212
Next

Return to advanced search