Search found 27 matches
- Fri Jan 17, 2014 11:48 am
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: PrimoCache & Pagefile
- Replies: 8
- Views: 7772
Re: PrimoCache & Pagefile
If you encouter high read/write activity on pagefile.sys more memory would be a better choice.
- Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:03 am
- Forum: Report Bugs
- Topic: Registry Corruption
- Replies: 15
- Views: 13093
Re: Registry Corruption
Try to reduce the latency time to 1 hour (3600 seconds). Anyway this seems to be a bug. 1 day is alot of time even with a SSD.
- Thu Aug 08, 2013 7:00 am
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Getting "Failed to start cache!"
- Replies: 11
- Views: 14005
Re: Getting "Failed to start cache!"
@Ivrak: Probably this is a matter of available RAM: your machine has not enough mem available for this cachesize *and* blocksize. The smaller the block size is, the more RAM is required for cache tag. How much RAM has your machine installed, is available before starting Primocache? And how much do y...
- Tue Feb 12, 2013 1:52 pm
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Caching a mapped network (NAS) drive
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4999
Re: Caching a mapped network (NAS) drive
Because of the chosen approach how FC works caching of NAS drives is technical not possible.
- Fri Jan 04, 2013 12:55 pm
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: A solution to preloading game data for you gamers?
- Replies: 25
- Views: 36357
Re: A solution to preloading game data for you gamers?
@OP,
see this (old) thread viewtopic.php?f=25&t=728 and check whether the solution proposed by magic-man and me helps.
- Frank
see this (old) thread viewtopic.php?f=25&t=728 and check whether the solution proposed by magic-man and me helps.
- Frank
- Sun Apr 01, 2012 12:56 pm
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: fancycache stopped working
- Replies: 9
- Views: 9113
Re: fancycache stopped working
Hi,
no, you sucks . UN-install any FC releases *and* reboot. Then install latest beta of FC *and* reboot. After this FC will work.
no, you sucks . UN-install any FC releases *and* reboot. Then install latest beta of FC *and* reboot. After this FC will work.
- Tue Mar 20, 2012 9:40 am
- Forum: Latest News
- Topic: [2012-02-27] FancyCache Beta 0.7.2 published
- Replies: 24
- Views: 61570
Re: [2012-02-27] FancyCache Beta 0.7.2 published
Q: How effective is Intels approach in detecting real large files operations belonging to the same file, as a large file is probably fragmented resulting in a couple of larger and smaller sequential operations?
- Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:18 am
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Overkill?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7400
Re: Overkill?
Not necessarily. At best the cache block size is the same as the cluster size of the filesystem. The default cluster size of NTFS is 4096 Bytes (4KB). But, on large volumes 8KB or more is also possible. Check e.g. with powershell on every logical disk (WIN7: admin rights required): fsutil fsinfo ntf...
- Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:05 am
- Forum: Latest News
- Topic: [2012-02-27] FancyCache Beta 0.7.2 published
- Replies: 24
- Views: 61570
Re: [2012-02-27] FancyCache Beta 0.7.2 published
@onder, your assumption is not true. On the level of operating of FC (block level filter driver) there is no information of the file that might be written or read, FC deals only with numbered "data blocks" relative to the partitions 1st data block or disks 1st data block. Maybe FC knows so...
- Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:50 am
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Overkill?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7400
Re: Overkill?
Use FCs default values, at next I would taken into account using the "write-only" instead of "read/write" cache configuration for every drive.